[ SECRET POST #3422 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3422 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 033 secrets from Secret Submission Post #489.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Related hijab opinion

[(Anonymous)]

But I don't object to any of those other choices either.

I mean, just in general, if someone is making a judgment which you think is erroneous in case A, but not making the same judgment in case B, it seems to me that the logical thing is to get them to correct their understanding of case A, not to extend the same faulty logic to case B. And yet, over and over again, I see people say the opposite: they don't mind if the person is wrong, as long as they're wrong fairly. It's stupid as hell.