[ SECRET POST #3426 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3426 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.

__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Renaud (French singer)]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #490.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

In porn, I usually have a tipping point when it comes to OOC-ness: if something is out of character technically but the character is NOT actualy explicitly described as someone who is a 180 from the porn characterization, I'm okay with it.

When they ARE described as such, though, the canon description usually just hammers repeatedly into my head as I'm reading the porn, producing the most surreal effect.

[philstar22]

For me, they have to be at least vaguely recognizable. If they have canon characters names but have no relation to anything the canon characters would do, then it just throws me out of the story.