[ SECRET POST #3433 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3433 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.

__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 57 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[(Anonymous)]

Why do you hate yourself?

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't hate myself, but I do know what we are. I know what men are capable of. I know what men are inclined to do. and I know that no-matter what word women use against us, we'll not change, not stop, not be any less monstrous than we are.

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[diet_poison]

On the off chance that you are actually a guy, please seek help.

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[(Anonymous)]

Why?

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[(Anonymous)]

Because you appear to have some deeply rooted self hate for your gender.

Basically, you need to be deprogrammed because you've been absorbing too much SJW/radfem bs.

Look at it this way: People are capable of being good to one another, and they are capable of being horrible. Neither capacity is gender based, and being male or female does not incline one to be more so than the other.

Believe me, in my life I have endured my fair share of horrible women. I've also known a few men who are complete tossers, but at least they weren't personal about it. They were equal opportunity jerks.

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[(Anonymous)]

Not OP, but I am the anon you replied to.

I dont think this counts as self hatred. Your whole speil sounds very much like your accusing AYRT of being a gender traitor. He recognises issues with how his gender act, this is not somthing to be deprogrammed, he should be celebrated for it. If he can find a way to turn these feeling to action he could really make the world a better place for women.

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[diet_poison]

Because the notion that an entire gender is inherently depraved is not only wrong but an extremely unhealthy way to think and it won't lead to good for anybody. I mean, I can't believe I'm actually having to explain this. But then, I think you know, and I also think at least 60% of the anons on this thread are the same person, so...

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[(Anonymous)]

If that's his experience of his own gender, I don't think we have any right to tell him he's wrong.

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[diet_poison]

So we should just let me continue to mansplain away without saying anything?

I mean we could just use the long definition of their behavior I suppose but it's a quick and easy term to describe a specific behavior (not to describe the men themselves) and I think we have a right to use it. it's just shorthand for something we're going to complain about anyway that we absolutely have the right to complain about.

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[dethtoll]

Sorry for the Arthur Chu, but you're just rehashing Scott Aaronson here. Careful you don't let that load of self-loathing spin your head around wrong. It's not hard to take that line of thinking -- that men are barely-tamed feral beasts incapable of keeping their hands or dicks to themselves -- and start using it to justify all kinds of misogynist thought.

(Assuming you're not, of course, Radfem troll.)

Re: Man-splaining wank: The reboot.

[(Anonymous)]

You're not wrong.