[ SECRET POST #3435 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3435 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.

__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Art pet peeves

[(Anonymous)]

I think with some series and characters that kind of approach can work.

Take Homestuck, for example. The main cast are intentionally designed to be sort of blank slates visually, and the human kids especially don't have much in the way of defining features aside from the very basics of a what a human being looks like. There's lots of room to get creative there while still keeping the characters recognizable as themselves. If you draw a picture of John Egbert with dark skin and facial hair, it will still be instantly recognizable as John Egbert as long as you keep the features emphasized in his canon design (namely, the glasses, hairstyle, and buck teeth).

But that doesn't work with every canon. It definitely doesn't work with live-action canons.