Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-05-30 07:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #3435 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3435 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Art pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2016-05-30 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Art pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2016-05-31 12:02 am (UTC)(link)Take Homestuck, for example. The main cast are intentionally designed to be sort of blank slates visually, and the human kids especially don't have much in the way of defining features aside from the very basics of a what a human being looks like. There's lots of room to get creative there while still keeping the characters recognizable as themselves. If you draw a picture of John Egbert with dark skin and facial hair, it will still be instantly recognizable as John Egbert as long as you keep the features emphasized in his canon design (namely, the glasses, hairstyle, and buck teeth).
But that doesn't work with every canon. It definitely doesn't work with live-action canons.
Re: Art pet peeves
But I ask the same thing about fanfics. I have no interest in an AU where nothing but the characters' names are remotely like canon... but apparently a lot of people do.
Re: Art pet peeves
Re: Art pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2016-05-31 12:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: Art pet peeves
Re: Art pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2016-05-31 12:27 am (UTC)(link)Re: Art pet peeves
It was a retelling if the Wicked Witch of the West lived in a different world governed by different rules where different things happened. Gee.
Re: Art pet peeves
Also, if a character isn't well-described in a book, you can get away with it pretty easy! If the only description for the character is, "he had a face like a foot and a smile like Hell's PR man," well, they can look like ANYTHING practically.
Re: Art pet peeves
On the other hand, it IS fun to experiment with different skin tones/body shapes without having to worry about creating your own character from scratch.