[ SECRET POST #3435 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3435 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.

__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I feel you're setting up a false dichotomy between "really bad" acts like cheating or publicly humiliating someone out of malice or for the sake of control, and "low-level" acts like snapping at someone when you're stressed or being late to a dinner date, which you are willing to regard as forgivable because you don't see them as serious, and they were accidental or done in a heated moment rather than with malice aforethought. (Really, how petty would you have to be to refuse to forgive someone for being late to a dinner date?)

You're proceeding from the assumption that "real, serious hurt" is always inflicted deliberately and not thoughtlessly, that what we perceive as "minor fuckups" never do major harm. (I'm also getting the vibe that you are operating from the premise that you are a person who has never and would never really, seriously hurt anyone, so you don't have to worry about doing anything that someone might refuse to forgive you for.)

Please point me to where I have said anyone is "entitled" to forgiveness, or where I laid down any requirements for being a "perfect victim." And I certainly never suggested that treating others as you would hope to be treated yourself is a deposit of karma in the forgiveness bank. It's certainly not a guarantee and I never suggested that it was one. If anyone is twisting the Golden Rule, it is you.

[diet_poison]

If it's not about karma or deserving then what is the point in basing your forgiveness of people on whether you'd want them to do it to you?

Unless you're just talking about having empathy for people, by putting yourself in their shoes, but if that's the case there are definitely other factors that going into forgiving someone. And forgiving someone does not always mean telling them about it, so empathy doesn't always play a role.

There's forgiving (which should be done for the benefit of the forgiver) and accepting/giving another chance, which is done for the benefit of the forgivee (or possibly both), and which the forgivee is NOT entitled to and should not be done only because the forgiver...wants to make sure they deserve to be forgiven or whatever. Or even only just because the forgiver feels bad about it, especially because the forgivee may be using guilt to manipulate them into maintaining a relationship.

Nobody is entitled to forgiveness. Choosing whether to let someone stay in your life should be done based on what you think is healthiest and what seems right, not whether they "deserve" it or whether you'd want someone to do it for you. That leads to unhealthy relationships.

(I hope I'm wording myself right.)