[ SECRET POST #3439 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3439 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[lupin sansei/lupin the third]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Pokemon]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Lord of the Rings]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[Animorphs]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Dark Tower]


__________________________________________________



















08. [SPOILERS for Shin Megami Tensei IV]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of rape]


[Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes, "The Adventure of the Solitary Cyclist"]


__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of rape]























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

The difference is intent imo.

[erinptah]

Yeah, the controversy over Blurred Lines is about whether the singer/producers/target audience seriously believe that date rape is sexy fun times.

And it's a reasonable fear, given that there are a ton of people who can't tell the difference between real-world date rape and sexy fun times.

Whereas it's easier to believe that the public in general, and Peter Gabriel in particular, don't approve of non-fictional stalking or breaking into people's homes to assault them.

[(Anonymous)]

I agree. I haven't listened to the songs the OP is talking about, but they sound like they are intended to be creepy and disturbing, while Blurred Lines doesn't seem to realize that it is.