[ SECRET POST #3440 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3440 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 79 secrets from Secret Submission Post #491.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Are beatniks venomous?

[(Anonymous)]

Or does it even matter since they're all extinct?

Side question: how closely are they related to the present day hipster and what adaptations of theirs are detrimental in today's climate?

Re: Are beatniks venomous?

[(Anonymous)]

Beatniks and hipsters are both fine, actually. Sometimes they are bad but mostly they're just people. There's nothing detrimental about them and the weird sort of holier-than-thou attitude that this kind of post exemplifies is at least as dumb as anything that annoys you about hipsters.

Re: Are beatniks venomous?

[(Anonymous)]

What! How very dare you come in here with logic and insight!

Re: Are beatniks venomous?

[(Anonymous)]

I'm more partial to the hippie, honestly.

Re: Are beatniks venomous?

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, hippie-ism isn't a lifestyle I would choose, but I can get down with occasionally going into the woods and getting real high and all that kind of thing, you know?

Re: Are beatniks venomous?

[(Anonymous)]

Are you just stringing together words with no concern for their context?

Re: Are beatniks venomous?

[(Anonymous)]

According to animal control, no. I called them in a panic once when one bit me (my fault; I was out in a known beatnik habitat and not paying enough attention to my surroundings and I startled it), and they said to keep the wound clean and keep a close watch for infection, but that otherwise I shouldn't worry. Hurt like hell for a couple weeks, but I didn't suffer any permanent damage and you can barely even see the scar.

Re: Are beatniks venomous?

[kaijinscendre]

Woah, woah, woah. Animal Control didn't have you go in for rabies shots? While beatniks carry rabies at lower rates than other LBSCGs, Animal Control should have at least made at attempt to locate the beatnik.

Re: Are beatniks venomous?

[(Anonymous)]

This was years ago, back before they disproved that study that had people thinking beatniks were immune to rabies. Obviously in retrospect I was lucky, but they were working off the knowledge they had at the time.

Re: Are beatniks venomous?

[kaijinscendre]

I'm really glad you were so lucky! Of course, a biting startled beatnik is less likely to be rabid than if it had attacked you unprovoked. Good think you were not in a punk habitat. They are rampant with rabies!

Re: Are beatniks venomous?

[dethtoll]