Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-06-06 06:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #3442 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3442 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

[resized, not a repeat]
__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 54 secrets from Secret Submission Post #492.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-06-08 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)And, you seem to be missing the point entirely. I'd much rather not tag something as silly as who tops/bottoms and ensure a readership that's wary of those ridiculous dynamics, than risk warning off people who'd rather avoid them by tagging. So, I'm perfectly happy with my choices, thanks. If it means I lose a reader who pretty much wants to ignore plot and characterization for the sake of some silly bedroom dynamics? *shrug* Not counting that as a big loss, tbh. And really, if that aspect is SO absolutely critical to your reading - then why wouldn't you ask? Leaving a whiny review on a fic because YOU don't like something that might be present in the fic and took the risk of reading anyway...well, that's a shitty, entitled thing to do.
Oh, and nowhere did I say I was asking for only positive reviews. I welcome concrit, gladly. But 'I wasted my time reading cuz the buttsex was wrong' is quite, quite stupid and your hang-up, not mine.