case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-06-11 03:25 pm

[ SECRET POST #3447 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3447 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 56 secrets from Secret Submission Post #493.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: RIP Christina Grimmie

(Anonymous) 2016-06-12 05:05 am (UTC)(link)
there are 91 deaths from guns every day in America, there is literally no time period throughout the day you can talk about gun control without it qualifying as "too soon" or "using" someone's death

Re: RIP Christina Grimmie

(Anonymous) 2016-06-12 10:43 am (UTC)(link)
You can talk about gun control it without mentioning recent victims. Unless you looked it up, you wouldn't be able to name most, if any, of them. What I'm trying to get at is don't use someone's death as a talking piece. It's fine to talk about gun control and the only way anything /will/ improve is by talking about it, but mentioning so and so's death, when you care nothing for them or their life, only their status as a victim, is just using their death as emotional bait and I think that's a scumbag move.