[ SECRET POST #3450 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3450 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Cracked After Hours]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Disney's Sword in the Stone]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Pokémon Sun and Moon]


__________________________________________________



05.
(Charlie Hunnam)


__________________________________________________



06.
[Jodie Foster]


__________________________________________________



07.
[New Blood]


__________________________________________________



08.
[DC Rebirth]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Jane the virgin / Juana la virgen]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 29 secrets from Secret Submission Post #493.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Orlando Shooting

[ill_omened]

Not many other ways to read that post really.

But yes, whilst ultimately he's the one who actually carried out the attack, people are products of their environment. Understanding that is key in prevent similar incidents.

Re: Orlando Shooting

[sparrow_lately]

It wasn't her job to stop him from murdering people.

Re: Orlando Shooting

[ill_omened]

I don't know how morally bankrupt you can be to believe this, but yes when you know someones going to commit a mass killing you have an ethical, and generally legal duty to stop that.

Can't believe you're actually arguing something so horrific to be honest.

Re: Orlando Shooting

[(Anonymous)]

This is an inflammatory issue and it's very to get drawn to one side or the other, but accusing someone else of being "morally bankrupt" for acknowledging that ethical questions are complicated is not only grossly naive, but...naively gross, frankly. Cut out the ad hominem attacks and please be civil.

Re: Orlando Shooting

[sparrow_lately]

If you read my original comment, you know my opinion is WE DON'T KNOW THE FACTS, let's not blame a likely abuse victim for her ex-husband's hate crime, because that's fucking stupid.

Re: Orlando Shooting

[ill_omened]

"It wasn't her job to stop him from murdering people."

I mean I'm all for the idea she may not have known. But if she was fully aware, it's all pretty simple as much as it is tragic.

Re: Orlando Shooting

[(Anonymous)]

YES IT WAS. Seriously. You have a LEGAL AND ETHICAL obligation to inform the authorities of these things. It was ABSOLUTELY her responsibility and it is horrifying to suggest otherwise.

Re: Orlando Shooting

[(Anonymous)]

Plenty of other ways to read that post, my man, like the way it was written: "we don't know all the information, and this makes it complicated." Sparrow said nothing about ~~~completely exonerating her or removing any association with the crime; she just acknowledged a very real tricky area here. If you aren't willing to see that this isn't a black-and-white question, you are the asshole.