case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-06-17 06:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #3453 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3453 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________













03. [SPOILERS for SnK]



__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Shadowhunters]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Attack On Titan/Shingeki no Kyojin]



__________________________________________________












06. [WARNING for RL family death]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for RL underage sex]

[Lori Maddox, Sable Starr]


__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for incest]

[Wynonna Earp]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #493.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Is "Male power fantasy" actually harmful

(Anonymous) 2016-06-17 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
It is not my sense that you're accurately characterizing the reaction of people in America, at the very least, with that. I mean, if nothing else, the judge in the case is going to get recalled and also is literally not being allowed to judge sexual assault cases anymore because of how bad the verdict was. Neither of those is an ordinary reaction that would indicate people think of this as normal operating procedure.

I would also say - I'm not saying don't get outraged, because it's outrageous. Outrage is the only appropriate response. But this is very much a weird, fucked-up, single anomaly, and I think understanding it as normal runs the risk of misunderstanding the nature of the structural injustices that actually are normal.