[ SECRET POST #3455 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3455 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Early because places to go!

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 66 secrets from Secret Submission Post #494.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

There are degrees of it, though.

[(Anonymous)]

Can you give me an example? I'm a bit face blind, and I can never tell how attractive people are supposed to be.

[(Anonymous)]

I think that a CW show - like Flash or Arrow or Supergirl now - is generally going to have a more conventionally attractive cast than, like, a CBS procedural, for instance, like NCIS or whatever.

Not that anyone on NCIS is ugly but it feels like a show like Arrow really, really, really has a great-looking cast and emphasizes that.

[(Anonymous)]

DA I'm not trying to be bitchy here, but I find that all US show casts now look kinda... samey. It's a bit boring.

[(Anonymous)]

Eh, I'm not disagreeing. There's certain trends. At the same time there's enough people out there that I like that I can live with it.

[(Anonymous)]

I genuinely don't mean this as an attack, just as an observation: You have a curiously shallow approach to media.

[(Anonymous)]

NA

Lol, this is a pretty - to use your word - "bitchy" observation, for someone who's "not trying to be bitchy."

[comma_chameleon]

Is pointing out that north american media is pretty objectively shallow (ESPECIALLY when it comes to main characters/shows aimed at the under thirty crowd) a bitchy observation though?

I mean, AYRT wasn't rude or aggressive in the way they stated it, and it's pretty damn true.

[(Anonymous)]

Uh, with respect, and I don't think it's a big deal, but anon didn't say that North American media was shallow, they said that the anon they were talking to was shallow

Like it was definitely directed at a specific person

[comma_chameleon]

Sorry, I misread it since the anon's original comment was about US media being samey, I took it as a royal 'you' not a 'you specifically are shallow'.

[(Anonymous)]

You say that as if other regions' media is... not? It's a pretty universal problem.

[comma_chameleon]

I think it's distinctly more prevalent/obvious in NA media? At least from my experience anyway?

I mean, most french/UK TV/movies I've seen seem to have a greater varietal of looks from conventionally non-attractive to conventionally attractive.

I haven't seen too many Bollywood films with conventionally unattractive people, but at the same time, I don't watch any Indian TV shows so I don't know if movies are the exception and the TV shows are more realistic.

[(Anonymous)]

Not really. It's one aspect that I like about shows. It just happens to be the specific one that we're talking about right now.