case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-06-19 02:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #3455 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3455 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Early because places to go!

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 66 secrets from Secret Submission Post #494.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-19 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
As much as I admire the raw physicality of Connery, Dalton, and Craig, it is the suaveness of Moore and Brosnan that does it for me in the Bond stakes. I would not be inviting the former set into my house (although I can buy them in the action sequences) and it is the latter who convince me Bond could truly infiltrate and seduce as a spy should.

I hope Craig's replacement is from the slim, smooth, and suave side of Bond rather than the roid raging brute.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-20 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, I like the Brosnan type.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-20 03:20 am (UTC)(link)
Ditto. I enjoyed Craig's portrayal, but I wouldn't mind if the franchise walked back the whole action sequence after action sequence plot and showed us a bit more spy work, paired with an appropriately suave Bond.