[ SECRET POST #3461 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3461 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 54 secrets from Secret Submission Post #495.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Characters that are supposed to be unattractive but are pretty in the film adaption

[(Anonymous)]

The Hound in Game Of Thrones. He's supposed to be horrifically burned to the point where no one wants to look at him, but on Rory McCann it just makes him look even more sexily badass.

Same goes for Tyrion. Peter Dinklage is a way handsomer than his character should be.

Re: Characters that are supposed to be unattractive but are pretty in the film adaption

[(Anonymous)]

They even lampshade it with Dinklage.

I don't really blame them, though - the hideous dwarf stereotypes were actually kind of uncomfortable to read and wouldn't play well on screen, not to mention the scars he took in the book would be seven shades of hell to get right in makeup for filming.

Re: Characters that are supposed to be unattractive but are pretty in the film adaption

[(Anonymous)]

Dinklage is one of the best-looking dwarves I've ever seen. (And those are few and far between.)