case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-07-04 06:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #3470 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3470 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #496.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
chardmonster: (Default)

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-07-05 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
Found the Destiel person. For the record I got Destiel confused with the incest ship.
Edited 2016-07-05 00:07 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2016-07-05 07:49 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT

I rarely post here about Destiel. It's just the "but you just do it for the fetish" argument against all shiper that really gets me.

For the record: I've NEVER read a Wincest shipper claim they ship Wincest for gay representation. Most Wincest shippers kind of hate that particular line and will insist they're better shippers because they admit they're in it for the kink.

(OTOH, I guess it is hard to actually push for Incest to be accepted AND claim a moral high ground)

But be it Destiel, Wincest, Poe/Finn, Sterek, Outlawqueen, whatever.. my point is that w eshould stop just claiming that because they ship it, it's just a fetish thing for them and not an honest wish to see more LGBT+ people in media.