case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-07-07 06:45 pm

[ SECRET POST #3473 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3473 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 11 secrets from Secret Submission Post #496.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-07-07 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Context please? I'm curious of this drama now...
kallanda_lee: (Default)

[personal profile] kallanda_lee 2016-07-07 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Same.
nanslice: (Default)

CONTEXT

[personal profile] nanslice 2016-07-07 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
https://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/1246598.html?thread=849250694

There you go! This happened on journalfen back in 2005 so I can't find the actual wank itself but this is a pretty good rundown of it.

Re: CONTEXT

(Anonymous) 2016-07-07 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Which secret does the rundown take place in?

Also, thanks! ✌️
nanslice: (Default)

Re: CONTEXT

[personal profile] nanslice 2016-07-07 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
it's not any of the secrets, I linked to the actual thread that discusses it. "RE: Favorite Fandom Drama EVER".

Re: CONTEXT

(Anonymous) 2016-07-07 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Never mind I found it haha sorry.
nanslice: (Default)

Re: CONTEXT

[personal profile] nanslice 2016-07-07 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh okay, lmao, no worries.
a_potato: (Default)

Re: CONTEXT

[personal profile] a_potato 2016-07-07 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Bless you for that link.

And...wow. Wow.
Edited 2016-07-07 23:41 (UTC)
nanslice: (Default)

Re: CONTEXT

[personal profile] nanslice 2016-07-07 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
You're welcome. I'm not sure if OP wanted to avoid naming names but. If that's the case, sorry OP!

Re: CONTEXT

(Anonymous) 2016-07-07 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Seriously wtf. What a stupid sociopath.
a_potato: (Default)

Re: CONTEXT

[personal profile] a_potato 2016-07-08 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
It just kept getting worse, too. The social Darwinist stuff at the end...I mean, damn. :(

Blackjack here

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
So, making a MISTAKE FOR WHICH I'VE APOLOGIZED FOR SEVERAL TIMES makes me a sociopath?

OP

(Anonymous) 2016-07-07 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Learning and reading about that was incredibly disappointing, and I wish I'd never read and liked their fic without knowing anything about them.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-07-07 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Sorry that happened OP. I kinda know that feel. I still remember that day I went to the profile of a fanfic author I liked and found out they're were a hardcore pro-lifer who supported abortion bombings lmao.
a_potato: (Default)

Re: OP

[personal profile] a_potato 2016-07-08 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
I can understand your disappointment. It's a pretty atrocious collection of views.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 10:30 am (UTC)(link)
it's also not the only time she's been an absolute asshole, she's still her everyday asshole self on tumblr
sarillia: (Default)

Re: CONTEXT

[personal profile] sarillia 2016-07-07 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh good. It was bugging me that I couldn't think of her name. I could picture the icon.
nanslice: (Default)

Re: CONTEXT

[personal profile] nanslice 2016-07-07 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I can't remember where I put my keys but I'll always remember wanks of old.
sarillia: (Default)

Re: CONTEXT

[personal profile] sarillia 2016-07-07 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Is this the same person who was convinced she could talk to her goldfish? Like the fish would understand and somehow communicate back? Do you remember that?

Oh wait, the fish could read! Was that instead of or in addition to the talking? My memory is failing here.
Edited 2016-07-08 00:17 (UTC)

Blackjack here

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
No, that would have to be someone else. I'm the one with the parrot that everyone tried to slander because she's grey and apparently looks like a pigeon.

I don't give a shit if people hate me but leave her out of it.

Re: CONTEXT

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
Good lord, that story...

(Setting aside the horrifically offensive things that person was saying about those affected by the hurricane, I'd like to know how somebody expects people to just naturally walk out of a city like New fucking Orleans.)

Re: CONTEXT

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
She was from some modest-sized town in (IIRC) Oregon or Washington, so I'm guessing she had very little appreciation of the sheer size of a great city and its metro area.

Re: CONTEXT

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 07:28 am (UTC)(link)
Apparently not. Which is bizarre to me-I'm from a small city of nearly 30,000 people in Iowa, I've never even BEEN to New Orleans (let alone Louisiana or the southern U.S. in general) and I know that New Orleans is quite a big place.

Hi, Blackjack here

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Context was "with a week's notice". Don't know if you remember that but it was pretty key.

Re: Hi, Blackjack here

(Anonymous) 2016-07-18 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Upthread you're saying you've apologized and are a different person now. Here you're still defending yourself (protip, shithead, they DIDN'T HAVE A WEEK'S NOTICE).