case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-07-08 06:18 pm

[ SECRET POST #3474 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3474 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Hide and Seek by Imogen Heap]



__________________________________________________



02. http://i.imgur.com/8Lfgcp8.jpg
[A Game of Thrones, Tyene Sand; link because OP warned for nudity]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Independence Day]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Queen at Arms]


__________________________________________________



05. [repeat]


__________________________________________________





















06. [WARNING for underage/shota]

[Boku no Pico]


__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for incest]
[WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for gore, torture]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #496.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2- too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Is anyone else really really angry at george takai?

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)
This isn't the 60's tho. Why keep to his vision when his vision is obsolete?

Re: Is anyone else really really angry at george takai?

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
This is a dumb argument. Dean Winchester is straight because he's straight in canon.

Nobody is stopping you from writing all the Sam/Dean your heart desires.

There is no vision. There's canon and then there's the freedom to ignore canon to do whatever you want, which we all still have and Takai isn't taking away.

Re: Is anyone else really really angry at george takai?

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Because Hollywood hasn't actually progressed much from the 60s? I mean, FFS, it's the same old tired tropes and casting over and over and over again.

Re: Is anyone else really really angry at george takai?

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Uh. Hollywood ISN'T keeping his vision. They added a gay character (with a husband and kid). Takei is the one keeping the 60s vision.

Re: Is anyone else really really angry at george takai?

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Takei is arguing that hollywood should "Respect his vision"

Re: Is anyone else really really angry at george takai?

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
But Hollywood isn't...so again, Hollywood is not keeping to anyone's "obsolete vision" in this case.