case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-07-08 06:18 pm

[ SECRET POST #3474 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3474 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Hide and Seek by Imogen Heap]



__________________________________________________



02. http://i.imgur.com/8Lfgcp8.jpg
[A Game of Thrones, Tyene Sand; link because OP warned for nudity]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Independence Day]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Queen at Arms]


__________________________________________________



05. [repeat]


__________________________________________________





















06. [WARNING for underage/shota]

[Boku no Pico]


__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for incest]
[WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for gore, torture]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #496.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2- too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Pro-Choice [Potential TW?]

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
How the fuck could a stop sign legally consent to marriage?

OP

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Idk, I just picked something random to get my point across that what other people do with their lives is none of my business or concern if it's not hurting me.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Your point is nonsensical. You can't marry animals or stop signs, because marriage requires consent. Not to mention, is a legal institution which determines taxes, inheritance, whatever.

I don't think anyone gives a fuck if you hold a marriage ceremony with your stop sign (you can throw any kind of party you want), but are you actually arguing it should be legally recognized?

OP

(Anonymous) 2016-07-08 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I've already had this discussion a few posts up. Feel free to read through that for my responses!

Re: Pro-Choice [Potential TW?]

(Anonymous) 2016-07-09 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry, but this comment is hilarious.