[ SECRET POST #3496 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3496 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #500.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[erinptah]

So she's used language that panders to antivaxxers, and that's not good. But she's also flat-out said "As a medical doctor, of course I support vaccines." And other unequivocal statements about how they're good and important. (Which they obviously are.)

I'm not saying not to criticize her at all, I just think, on balance, that still puts her on the light side of the force.

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, come on. She used the words "toxic substances like mercury." The amounts of mercury in vaccines at the time were so minuscule you'd have to take a hundred vaccines at once to approach what you get eating a single freaking can of tuna. We don't need politicians, especially not politicians who are doctors, for pete's sake, pulling bullshit language to pander to anti-vaxxers. And away from real science.

[dethtoll]

Yeah, this. Trying to waffle and understate the importance of vaccines and making vague references to common anti-vax rhetoric isn't good in any sense.