[ SECRET POST #3496 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3496 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #500.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Ehh, maybe. I think Romney would be too associated with previous failures. He's ultimately not the sort of person who has a lot of appeal right now; working with finance would count as a strike against him.

Unfortunately, the lesson a lot of Republicans took away from the 2012 election was that they needed to double-down on their beliefs. That if they'd had someone more hardcore as their candidate, they would have won.

Trump only partly fits the bill. The GOP has traditionally been the more free trade-oriented party, and Trump completely abandons that. He does, however, appeal to the nativist elements (along with some social conservatives, though he's wobbly on those issues—still people go for him).

I actually don't think Trump believes much of what he says, but it'd still be hideously foolish to elect someone that narcissistic to the Oval Office. Plus, he's a populist, so he'll keep doing whatever he can to keep the crowds happy. I can see him telling supporters to vote hostile or resistant GOP congresspeople out of office, and to vote in more Trump-friendly types. This could make things much worse.

Thus, even though I don't really trust Clinton, I find her the safer option. The fact that she isn't actively courting racists and sexists makes her the only sane choice. I'm not white, and I don't like the kind of rhetoric I'm hearing from Trump.

[(Anonymous)]

I actually don't think Trump believes much of what he says, but it'd still be hideously foolish to elect someone that narcissistic to the Oval Office.

Yep. Even if he doesn't personally give a shit whether or not same-sex couples marry, his vice presidential candidate sure as hell does. And people around him who are more concrete in their conservative beliefs would also do their part to try and push their policies out there. Having a Republican president would embolden them.