[ SECRET POST #3512 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3512 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #502.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

i think it's a little more reasonable to read her as gay when the actress is, in fact, gay as heck

but, you know, i do get where you're coming from and i wish female characters who were outside the standard het feminine mold weren't so rare that we had to fight over stuff like this

[(Anonymous)]

"i think it's a little more reasonable to read her as gay when the actress is, in fact, gay as heck"

That is a pretty bad mindset.

[(Anonymous)]

how so

[kallanda_lee]

nayrt to, but historically these been hundreds of gay actors who played straight roles just fine, and more recently vice versa. I mean, the whole point of acting is...acting.

[(Anonymous)]

sure, but we're talking about how to read a specific role that's presented in a specific way played by a specific actress, in a case where we've already acknowledged the character in question doesn't present as classically cis/het/feminine.

i agree with the broader point you're making.

[cbrachyrhynchos]

There's no reason to fight. People can interpret her however they want.

[(Anonymous)]

This is fandom. Gotta fight about something.