case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-08-21 03:12 pm

[ SECRET POST #3518 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3518 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Star Trek: Voyager]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Voltron]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Up the Women]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Digimon Adventure 02]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Assassin's Creed: Syndicate]


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Sims]


__________________________________________________



08.
[The X-Files]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Letterkenny, Stewart/Katy]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 49 secrets from Secret Submission Post #503.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
kittydesade: (Default)

[personal profile] kittydesade 2016-08-21 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
For all those who are saying Moriarty seemed a bit contrived: that's because he is. He appeared in one story in the original canon, and that was the one where Holmes died. Or "died," as it turned out to be. He was mentioned in one or two others, but in the original canon he was never an archenemy except in that his was the story where ACD chose to kill Holmes.

And no, I don't take any particular position on the subject. I just think that's why some Moriarties seem better than others; we're not given hardly anything in original canon but by now it's become tradition that Sherlock Holmes' archenemy is Moriarty, and a Holmes story that doesn't eventually address it will have to address endless questions why not. So, yes. Contrived. At least that much.