case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-08-22 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #3519 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3519 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #503.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-08-23 11:14 am (UTC)(link)
I'm guessing this is where "demisexual" comes from - giving a name to that particular exception to asexuality.

And yep, I agree on the bisexuality thing. There's a difference between a guy going "I love both men and women" (bisexual) or "I love you, I don't care if you're a man" (straight with an exception).

Given how fluid sexuality is though, I'd love to live in a world where labels aren't needed and you just love who you love. (But I also recognize that in our current world, labels are needed still.)
darkmanifest: (Default)

[personal profile] darkmanifest 2016-08-23 11:24 am (UTC)(link)
There's a difference between a guy going "I love both men and women" (bisexual) or "I love you, I don't care if you're a man" (straight with an exception).

That's a nicely concise way to put it. And yeah, if one day people can just chill with or not chill with any consenting adult without being pushed to explain why, it'd be fantastic.