case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-08-28 03:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #3525 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3525 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #504.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-08-29 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
also isn't sexualization inherently objectifying?

No, most certainly not. There's a difference between a subject (which has agency) and an object (which does not).

And if you are one of the people who thinks there is absolutely no bleeding of values of any kind between fiction and reality I honestly don't even want to have that argument right now...