case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-09-06 06:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #3534 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3534 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Paget Brewster, Criminal Minds]


__________________________________________________



03.
(Orange is the New Black)


__________________________________________________



04.
[Lord of the Rings]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Misha Collins, Supernatural]


__________________________________________________



06.
(Breaking Bad)


__________________________________________________



07.
[Pokemon Fire Red/Leaf Green]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 26 secrets from Secret Submission Post #505.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Casual ableism

(Anonymous) 2016-09-06 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
just because someone is an asshole doesn't mean it's okay to use ableism to take them down

Re: Casual ableism

(Anonymous) 2016-09-06 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

Is calling someone stupid ableist?

If not, how is it different from calling someone's reading comprehension bad?

Re: Casual ableism

(Anonymous) 2016-09-06 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Nah. If they are being an asshole about a written document (misinterpreting it, blatantly ignoring it, etc), it is perfectly okay to question their ability to read.