[ SECRET POST #3534 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3534 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Paget Brewster, Criminal Minds]


__________________________________________________



03.
(Orange is the New Black)


__________________________________________________



04.
[Lord of the Rings]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Misha Collins, Supernatural]


__________________________________________________



06.
(Breaking Bad)


__________________________________________________



07.
[Pokemon Fire Red/Leaf Green]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 26 secrets from Secret Submission Post #505.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Casual ableism

[(Anonymous)]

da
But you aren't saying "you're so lazy you didn't even read what I wrote" you're saying "you can't read". Why not say your intent, instead of relying on the engrained judgement of someone's ability?

Re: Casual ableism

[(Anonymous)]

The latter is a much better insult?

Re: Casual ableism

[(Anonymous)]

But why is that?

Re: Casual ableism

[(Anonymous)]

NA
Because no one wants to be lacking something. But I get the feeling this conversation will just go round and round until you boil it down to "but why insult people at all!"

Re: Casual ableism

[(Anonymous)]

No, I'm not saying why insult people at all, I am saying why be inaccurate with your insults - why not say what you mean?

But you know, whatever.

Re: Casual ableism

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

It's not inaccurate. If being lazy makes your reading comprehension suck, then both insults are saying the same thing. One's just saying it better.