[ SECRET POST #3534 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3534 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Paget Brewster, Criminal Minds]


__________________________________________________



03.
(Orange is the New Black)


__________________________________________________



04.
[Lord of the Rings]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Misha Collins, Supernatural]


__________________________________________________



06.
(Breaking Bad)


__________________________________________________



07.
[Pokemon Fire Red/Leaf Green]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 26 secrets from Secret Submission Post #505.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Trial by internet.

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT
You can't just pick and choose which sentences you believe are just or unjust based on feels and a misplaced sense of justice despite not having insight into all the facts and proof the court has though. In most cases, you do not have any access to any evidence, so you making the moral judgment of "but the courts are wrong, my judgement is right" is complete bullshit if you can't actually base your opinion on facts.

Re: Trial by internet.

[(Anonymous)]

I agree that you have to be careful about how much information you have access to, but I think this is broadly the case for human judgment in general, so I don't think this is a special case or a particular barrier. You should treat it the same as you treat any other things.

Second, I would point out that the most controversial cases are usually the ones that do have pretty widespread coverage, which means that there is a good amount of accessibility for facts.