case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-09-07 06:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #3535 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3535 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #505.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
a_potato: (Default)

[personal profile] a_potato 2016-09-08 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
Comments can't really tell you whether a fic is good, though? If a fic hits a fandom's collective id the right way, it's gonna be adored, regardless whether it's well-written.

Also, I mean...it's fic. It's mostly going to be bad. Most published fiction is bad, and that stuff has to go through editors and boards and whatnot. At the end of the day, we're accessing works that were written for free and for the pure sake of it by people who are, by and large, not professionals, and while there are those who want to get better, there are also those who are just looking to have fun. Expectations ought to be set accordingly.

It just ain't serious business, in any case.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-08 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
Sometimes, though, the comments can tell you whether a fic is hitting a fandom's collective id--or at least, the collective id of some of the fandom. Sometimes the kind of praise a fic is receiving is enough to warn you away.
a_potato: (Default)

[personal profile] a_potato 2016-09-08 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm, that's a good point! There are some fics where, if you see enough of a certain type of positive comment, you can make a pretty good assumption of what it's gonna be like.

I feel like that's a really uneven rubric to go by, though. I've come across some really horribly written fics that have, for whatever reason, inspired amazing meta-analysis in the comments.