[ SECRET POST #3538 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3538 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 56 secrets from Secret Submission Post #506.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Banned Books

[(Anonymous)]

Banning doesn't seem like a very good/practical/positive way of combating toxic ideas or protecting children from non-child-appropriate materials. Certainly there are books that shouldn't be taught in school (50 Shades of Gray, to take a kind of silly but hopefully useful example), which is why we have teachers. And certainly there are books that shouldn't be published because they're just crazy/evil people ranting, which is why we have editors.

Re: Banned Books

[(Anonymous)]

Editors are moral gatekeepers? I thought they were businesspeople.

Re: Banned Books

[(Anonymous)]

no, not so much moral gatekeepers as people who will reject a lot of books that are truly not worth reading (and accept a lot too, but my point is just that there's some measure of quality control)