case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-09-18 03:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #3546 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3546 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #507.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-18 08:45 pm (UTC)(link)
If you're both smart and an easily startled coward who can't calm down to think through a life threatening problem I wouldn't call you the smartest character. Not trying to insult you. I would call you "a smart character" but not "the smartest" in any applicable sense to resolving the disaster situation. My point was that in order for disasters to continue and be dire, the people who can solve the problem have to have plot deaths.
sarillia: (Default)

[personal profile] sarillia 2016-09-18 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I think we're looking at intelligence differently. I don't think "the smartest characters" and "the people who can solve the problem" are always the same.

I agree with your main point though that people who would be able to solve the problem too quickly need to be taken out of the plot.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-18 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
In evidence: the Healing Cock. (There's probably a smart one out there, but that's the exception to the rule.)