case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-09-19 07:53 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #3547 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3547 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #507.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
What? It totally doesn't have to be problematic to be entertaining. There are plenty of shows with minor issues (if they have issues at all) that are very entertaining. And there are plenty of shows that are problematic and are horrendous. I have no idea where you are getting that supposed correlation from.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Are sex and violence problematic?

'Cuz I find both of those really damn entertaining. Especially if they're combined.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
Name a single truly entertaining non-problematic show.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
Brooklyn Nine-Nine

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
Ah because having one gay black authority figure cancels out all the sexism, ageism, ableism, and jokes about eating disorders on display? Try again.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
I haven't watched Brooklyn Nine Nine but are you saying you find 'sexism, ageism, ableism, and jokes about eating disorders' directly proportional to what you find entertaining?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
I am claiming nothing, except that it is not non-problematic.

That was the challenge one entertaining show that was non-problematic. Brooklyn 99, regardless of any entertainment value, is not non-problematic.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
It's incredibly clever how you're going to call any show that gets mentioned problematic

it's fucking incredible

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
I think you'll find that is precisely the point. The claim was that there are entertaining shows that are non-problematic. Your admission that that is not the case is accepted.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
But it doesn't really fit the argument we were having. Because what I thought we were trying to discuss was the idea that problematicness leads to entertaining - that if things weren't problematic, they were boring. But this doesn't show that there's a link between problematicness and entertainment - just that if you set a sufficiently high bar for problematicness, nothing can pass over it.

I'm honestly really, really much more interested in the idea that being problematic is necessary to be entertaining, not that being problematic is inevitable.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT

Well, that's what tumblr does, right?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT

An entertaining show I like is Arthur and I don't think it has anything offensive in it.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
Think again. Even Sesame Street is problematic. Bert & Ernie are a classic case of queerbaiting.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I LOL'd.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 05:19 am (UTC)(link)
My cat from hell maybe?
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only