[ SECRET POST #3551 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3551 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Star Trek]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________















07. [WARNING for non-con]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for mentions/discussion of abuse, rape, pedophilia, etc]

[YuGiOh! The Abridged Series, Little Kuriboh]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 47 secrets from Secret Submission Post #507.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

There are plenty countries where 14 is the age of consent. So by your definition, a legal relationship of a 14 year old with an older person would still by pedophilia as long as the 14 year old doesn't look particularly developed. Furthermore, by your definition ("underdeveloped secondary sex characteristics") a relationship with a flat-chested, petite adult woman or a higher-than usual voiced petite adult man could still be counted as pedophilia.

[(Anonymous)]

That's not my definition, that's a medical definition, officially recognized by medical authorities across the world.

And yes, if I met a guy who purposefully seeks out and dates women who look like pre-pubescent children and actively tried to convince them to not try to make themselves look their age via make-up or clothes, I would be careful around that guy. Though I'd have been happy that a person with clearly pedophilic tendencies is choosing to act them out with someone capable of consenting to this.