case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-09-28 06:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #3556 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3556 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Lord of the Rings trilogy]



__________________________________________________



02.
[pride and prejudice; unnamed others]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Endeavour]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Tim Curry / Movies: IT, Rocky Horror Picture Show, Clue, Legend]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[Loud House]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[MST3K]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #508.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
I agree! And I'm totally not trying to diminish that. That's why I tried to contextualize it with something like going to the bathroom (i.e. something we all have to deal with but don't usually bother writing about)

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
Sure. But my point is that I don't think OP's attitude comes out of being a poor writer paying too much attention to detail. It comes out of inexperience with sex, specifically - like anon said above, they do have experience with peeing, and they don't have experience with having sex, and you don't necessarily know which parts about having sex are going to be things that you don't need to mention like you do with going to the bathroom. And it comes from being anxious about that specific inexperience.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think OP's attitude comes out of being a poor writer

Okay, I'm going to pick this out--I agree with your other stuff, by the way.

Offering advice or picking out a possible pitfall isn't calling someone a bad writer. It's the only way we get good. And good writers can always get better. The day you start interpreting suggestions and criticism as attacks is the day you stagnate.

My advisor loves my writing. I'm currently working with a draft covered in notes anyway. Why? Because she cares about me. Good writers can always get better.
Edited 2016-09-29 02:37 (UTC)

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
Ok, no. You can't just ignore the tone behind what is essentially "I'm afraid you've been mislead you poor sweet summer child." Your commentary wasn't about making a good writer better or a bad writer less bad. It was a condescending ego stroke.

chardmonster: (Default)

Re: So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
"Hi I'm inexperienced, what is ____ like?"

"Hey you might not even need it in your story we usually don't bother to write about it anyway."

"HOW DARE YOU"

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
Difference being, I wasn't asking about writing. I was asking about sex.
chardmonster: (Default)

Oh good grief.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
If you're going to be this offended when someone you don't even know offers advice, I kind of hope you only get kudos. I'm not sure AO3 comments would sit well.

Re: Oh good grief.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
Seriously is condescension your only mode?
chardmonster: (Default)

Of course not dear

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
I also have anger, lust, and anxiety

But seriously your overreaction is fucking hilarious. If you dislike me why the fuck are you talking to me? Go write about the sex towel, it's fine. Some people will like it and some won't. Just make sure it's working for your story.

Re: Oh good grief.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 06:14 am (UTC)(link)
Yes it is and everyone else who disagrees with her is automatically stupid. It's her usual behaviour, being constantly condescending.

Re: Oh good grief.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
There's also world-weary, pseudo-intellectual cynic. You know the type. Usually, they're college students who took a few philosophy classes and decide to carry around a notebook to "record their thoughts" and flirt with nihilism for a bit, maybe buy a beret. Most people grow out of that phase, but those people don't know. They haven't stared into the abyss. Not like chardmonster has.

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
That's a fair point and I agree. What I was trying to drive at was that I didn't think about it in terms of a writing flaw.

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly. It's a question of "if I don't mention this, is the average person going to read it and be all "buhhhh...are they just going to sleep in a puddle of their own mess?" Or is it the sort of thing that one would read and infer that it just wasn't very messy. IDK, because VIRGIN.

Leaping straight to "oh, I bet someone's convinced you that every little thing of life must be documented in painstaking detail" defies logic.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 03:43 am (UTC)(link)
Leaping straight to "oh, I bet someone's convinced you that every little thing of life must be documented in painstaking detail" defies logic.

You've never read a story that does that? I have.