[ SECRET POST #3557 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3557 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 11 secrets from Secret Submission Post #508.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I'm glad that you agree he was abuisve and racist. But he was more abusive, and abusive in a pointed, intentional way instead of the Victorian neglect of most of the other (non-DADT) teachers. And I see no reason to believe that Snape stopped being a racist after he stopped working for Voldemort. He certainly kept acting racist by bullying Muggle kids.

[(Anonymous)]

Do you think trying to turn a child into an animal to punish him (as Hagrid tried to with Dudley) isn't abusive or making Neville wait outside the common room while a potential murderer is on the loose as punishment isn't abusive?

Not to mention the actions of the so-called heroes like Hermione permanently scarring a girl's face or having a teacher being dragged off to be gang-raped by centaurs.

And I see no reason to believe that Snape stopped being a racist after he stopped working for Voldemort. He certainly kept acting racist by bullying Muggle kids.

There's no evidence that Snape gave a shit as he hated everyone. Neville was a pureblood and Snape targeted him the most. When the painting of Regulus called Hermione a mudblood he snapped at it and told him not use that word. And so forth.

[(Anonymous)]

do you know what abuse is, or do you just think any time someone does something mean to anyone it's abuse?

you're challenging someone on the internet, probably making them uncomfortable with your use of foul language! STOP ABUSING THEM!

[(Anonymous)]

I'm pretty sure potentially endangering someone's life or getting them gang-raped goes beyond being mean.

[(Anonymous)]

Pro-tip: fanon =/= canon, no matter how much you insist it's based on mythology.

[(Anonymous)]

The centaur thing is a huge reach considering they've featured as non-rapey beings in other books too, and in JKR's books I doubt she'd have Gone There.

[(Anonymous)]

You have a woman being dragged off by mythological creatures known for raping women and when she comes back she is visibly traumatized with no immediate physical wounds.

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

The problem with that is that you assume JKR's centaurs are the abusive rapist type of mythology, which they show no evidence of in any of the other books. In fact, they show more similarity with wise centaurs like Chiron, and stargazer centaurs like C.S.Lewis put in the Narnia books.