[ SECRET POST #3557 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3557 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 11 secrets from Secret Submission Post #508.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Why do porn apologists think being anti-porn is the same as being anti-sex?

[(Anonymous)]

But like...what's your endgame? Pornography is a thing that has existed pretty much since the dawn of humanity, and shutting down all the studios in Cali wouldn't change a thing. They'd move to places with fewer regulations and fewer protections in place for the actresses/actors, it would become more exploitative, more dangerous, more fucked up. And people will still pay for it, always. That's not a thing that's ever going to change. So wouldn't you rather it be at least somewhat protected than underground with no restrictions?

Re: Why do porn apologists think being anti-porn is the same as being anti-sex?

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT, but I'm not anti porn and I think the solution is more regulation and also more openness about the shit that happens. People can be persuaded that sweatshops are bad without becoming nudists. Unfortunately I think for some people the fucked up shit is a draw.