Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-10-09 03:10 pm
[ SECRET POST #3567 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3567 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 72 secrets from Secret Submission Post #510.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 01:49 pm (UTC)(link)With the Killing Joke especially, the elements featured in the story, the contrast/mirroring of Batman and Joker's backstories/psyche, the ambiguous ending, etc. all were pretty novel at the time (or so I hear?). But when you have people remaking the Killing Joke, you don't get any of that novelty and instead you just get a replay of a fairly traumatic story for women where women somehow manage to be fairly incidental to the story overall. Remaking the Killing Joke takes it out of the context it was made in (where it shined) and puts it in a different context where it has no novelty (like, even someone who is familiar with modern incarnations of Batman like the Nolan movies but HAVEN'T read The Killing Joke will still find something familiar in this portrayal of Batman and the Joker) but still has the problematic aspects. The story is still great, but replaying it seems gratuitous.