[ SECRET POST #3582 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3582 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Daredevil, Wilson Fisk/Vanessa Marianna]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Overwatch]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Mob Psycho 100]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Malcolm in the Middle]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #512.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[herpymcderp]

But... put it this way: in the context of your argument that still means someone out there wants to see a raccoon get fucked, if not fuck that raccoon.

I personally don't think the distinction is perhaps as nuanced in terms of attraction in this particular circumstance. ...I was also under the impression that the major pairing here was Rocket/Groot, so somehow someone is finding something to get off to about raccoon sex and/or tree person sex. Correct me if I'm wrong lol.

Unless people are writing porn and pairing Rocket with humans because their thing is seeing humans get it from non-humans which is in general a different thing entirely and I'll concede can have very little to do with being attracted to a nonhuman thing (for some people; for others it's definitely all about the being attracted to the nonhuman thing).

tl;dr I just don't think that for the most part people write porn about things they don't find remotely sexually stimulating somehow. Although I will also concede that I do realize there are totally asexual people who do write porn so the emphasis is definitely on "most part".

OP

[(Anonymous)]

This reminds me of the argument that people who write My Little Pony porn all want to fuck horses. There's a pretty big difference between porn of characters you know and love and porn of characters you know nothing about, regardless of their personalities.

[(Anonymous)]

Not exactly. Someone out there wants to see Rocket, who happens to be a raccoon, in a sex scene. That's why I keep using "character" instead of "raccoon." I highly doubt the same people get off on random raccoons having sex in the forest, or want to have sex with raccoons. Characters come with personalities and histories and that makes it far more complicated than "raccoon I want to fuck" or "hot plant/raccoon bough in butt sexytime", you know.

Finding something to get off to in Rocket/Groot is not the same as finding tree/raccoon hot and I'm willing to bet a whole lot that the fans are in it for the former and not the latter by a huge huge margin.

[world_eater]

im with u