Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2016-10-31 06:36 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2016-10-31 06:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #3589 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3589 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 51 secrets from Secret Submission Post #513.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Re: Inspired by #1
Descriptive pairing names (like the abovementioned Pumpkin Pie) I find make no sense half the time, and the other half they're genius. I want to give a medal to whoever came up with calling Tony/Steve/Bruce "Stark Spangled Banner".
_____shipping names are just silly.
Re: Inspired by #1
(Anonymous) 2016-11-01 01:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: Inspired by #1
On that note, a descriptive name is good if it is obvious what the parts are.
I do know at one point (over 10 years ago mind you), the "[...]shipping" names were a thing in the Pokemon fandom, but from what I recall about what I heard back then (and I was never in the Pokemon fandom, so I heard it secondhand), they could be as obscure as the descriptive names like Pumpkin Pie.