case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-11-26 02:24 pm

[ SECRET POST #3615 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3615 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #517.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-11-26 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
To be fair, all those disclaimers wouldn't have actually prevented anyone from being sued. That's not how copyright law works, at least not in the U.S. It does not say that it's okay to use other peoples' characters and work as long as you're explicit about it not belonging to you. I don't know why fandom believes that's a legit loophole.

kallanda_lee: (Default)

[personal profile] kallanda_lee 2016-11-27 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
It's not a legit loophole, people are just less likely to sue. the thing with copyright is it's never a problem unless someone actually calls you out on it, and companies can't be bothered to sue penniless college kids mostly.