Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-01-01 03:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #3651 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3651 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 52 secrets from Secret Submission Post #522.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-01 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)My first instinct is IM, because that's what I would have been using at the time. But I didn't get a cell phone until 2007, and it wasn't very good for texting. The characters would have cells, but would they have been using them to carry on a somewhat long conversation like we do with smartphones nowadays?
Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-01 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)IM sounds more plausible to me out of the two.
Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-01 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)No way, if we're assuming average college age guy who is not a geek or a gamer. The average person uses Facebook messenger and probably the app version at that.
Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-01 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-01 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)I used Yahoo messanger/AIM all the time in 2005, but my family were always a bit behind technologically and I'm 6 years younger than the characters then.
Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) - 2017-01-01 22:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) - 2017-01-01 23:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: IM or texting- 2005
Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) - 2017-01-02 07:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-01 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)If they're in different countries, computers are more likely.
Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-01 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-01 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-01 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)Re: IM or texting- 2005
Texting was a thing, but at that point in time you were still paying per SMS message unless you had a really expensive cell phone plan. Unless they're very rich college students, they're definitely not going to have an $80/month plan.
Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-01 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-01 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)In 2005, I was in early high school. I was a bit of a nerd, but even so, lots of my friends communicated on AIM. That, or through Xanga or Livejournal.
I think I got my first cell phone in like 2006, though I suppose a college age guy would feasibly have one. But texting then was slower and clunkier, and messages couldn't be very long.
They MIGHT have had Facebook, but more likely not, in 2005.
Re: IM or texting- 2005
I was a freshmen in college in 2005 and texting was absolutely not a thing everyone had. I think the razr came out in 2006/2007? IM would be be an acceptable option for sure, but it depends on what they are talking about.
The issue with IMs might be that they would have to both be around, away messages were a thing then and so you'd get those. Perhaps they would use email too?
Feel free to ask more questions.
Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-01 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)Well I did consider this, but it's fiction and there's no story if they don't talk to each other! I know they wouldn't talk on the phone about it.
Context: One character is 21, a senior that fall; the other guy is 20, a year behind. They both go to college on the West Coast, and the senior guy was casually dating the junior's (male) roommate.
As it's currently written, he's gotten an away message from the sometimes-boyfriend and talks to his friend instead as he is online (despite their living on opposite coasts). But then I second-guessed the IM aspect and wondered whether they'd be texting instead, so here I am asking.
Re: IM or texting- 2005
Re: IM or texting- 2005
I'm past college age but I text my bros regularly just to talk, share memes, send cool videos of stuff on the internet... that kind of thing.
Re: IM or texting- 2005
Now is different.
Re: IM or texting- 2005
Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-02 07:36 am (UTC)(link)Re: IM or texting- 2005
Re: IM or texting- 2005
Re: IM or texting- 2005
(Anonymous) 2017-01-02 01:27 am (UTC)(link)Re: IM or texting- 2005
I'm exactly the age you're looking for.
We were using an instant messenger account, probably AIM but potentially Yahoo Messenger, MSN, or one of a number of third party clients that attempted to let you use all three. I was a nerd, but instant messenger had really broad usage. A college student might not have had unlimited texting, so instant messenger was really important. I know I got in trouble because I had a friend who insisted on texting, I was a pushover, and my Dad got the 15-cent-a-text bill.
I believe an anon suggested that people would be using Facebook? No way. Facebook at that point only existed on a few college campuses and didn't have nearly the impact it does now. We did have Myspace, but if I recall correctly messaging on that was pretty rudimentary compared to IMs, and they often had a link to your IM account instead.
Re: IM or texting- 2005