Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-01-04 06:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #3654 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3654 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #522.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: bad fandom opinions
Fuck those people. Fuck 'em. Scully was awesome, and her skepticism, although often unwarranted, was exactly what Mulder needed to balance him out -- just as his credulity was what she needed. They were positively beautiful together.
...huh, I guess I have a character for the "what character will you defend with every breath" thread, after all.
Re: bad fandom opinions
(Anonymous) 2017-01-05 03:03 am (UTC)(link)Hahaha! Truth be told, I couldn't agree more.
Personally, it didn't even bother me that Scully continued to be a skeptic after everything she'd seen. Because that was what was needed. I mean, I think if the writers had been better there would have been a more perceptible shift from, "nonbeliever Scully" to "still very skeptical and also freaked out by this shit" Scully, to "Okay, all this weird shit is happening but we still need to nail it down with some science otherwise we're no wiser than we were before we witnessed it" Scully. But the writers were never very good at writing the characters emotions and psyches with a consistent degree of complexity, which led to Scully's skepticism feeling somewhat unchanging throughout. (Similar to how the writers would make inroads to Mulder coping with and moving past some of his early trauma, only to completely negate any such progress a couple of episodes later.)
Where am I going with this? I don't know. Scully was awesome. The writers sometimes sucked. Her skepticism was necessary, and also I always thought the fact that she continued to insist on figuring out how to explain things with science was one of the strongest parts of her character. It seemed like a difficult and largely thankless job, and she was brave to keep at it.
Re: bad fandom opinions
I agree with you, though, that it would have been a lot more interesting, and would have made the characters richer, if there had been the kind of progression you talk about. But Chris Carter is the kind of writer who's great at assembling ducks, and not so good at getting them into a row.
Re: bad fandom opinions
(Anonymous) 2017-01-05 04:38 am (UTC)(link)