case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-01-20 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #3670 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3670 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________
























03. [SPOILERS for The Babadook]



__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Steven Universe]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Pokemon Sun and Moon]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Inuyasha: The Final Act]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for abuse, etc]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for eating disorders]

[Final Fantasy XII]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #524.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-01-21 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
You know what part of it is? There's this sentiment in some corners of fandom , moral guardian-y nonsense that if you enjoy an abusive character (or one the fandom has declared abusive) that means you are okay with abuse and an "abuse apologist" and thus the lowest of scum. This is so some people in fandom can have a moral high ground and a cause to feel good for ("I'm fighting the normalization of abuse!") while also getting to bully people.

Its spreading like a gasfire around fandom and many of these types of people tend to be vocal and take a position of unwarranted authority in fangroups. Because they're power hungry shitfucks.