case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-01-23 06:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #3674 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3673 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #525.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Star Wars Thread

(Anonymous) 2017-01-23 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Star Wars Episode 8 has a name! The Last Jedi.
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Default)

Re: Star Wars Thread

[personal profile] morieris 2017-01-24 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
I don't even know what to say about that besides Oh boy
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Star Wars Thread

[personal profile] philstar22 2017-01-24 12:01 am (UTC)(link)
Awesome. Getting excited. I really want to see Rogue One again before it leaves the theater, though.
shortysc22: (Default)

Re: Star Wars Thread

[personal profile] shortysc22 2017-01-24 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
I'm excited to see it either way, considering the last two ovies have been pretty entertaining.

Re: Star Wars Thread

(Anonymous) 2017-01-24 04:19 am (UTC)(link)
I'm looking forward to 11 months of "Luke's gonna die!", people endlessly pointing out thar Jedi can be singular or plural, and Darth Maul speculation.

Re: Star Wars Thread

(Anonymous) 2017-01-24 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I haven't gone looking for flailing. Has it revived "This is irrefutable PROOF Rey is the daughter of Luke/Obi-Wan Kenobi/Qui-Gon Jinn/Tarkin/SithLord Jar-Jar/The Force Itself!" ?

Re: Star Wars Thread

(Anonymous) 2017-01-24 07:08 pm (UTC)(link)
That never stopped, but it has energized the Rey Skywalker theorists.

Re: Star Wars Thread

(Anonymous) 2017-01-24 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)
They're so insufferable. I can't shake the feeling that they only want that so either they have 'proof' that Luke had straight playboy adventures in space or they want to give him credit for everything Rey accomplishes.

(I don't think she is because they made it clear they took prequel criticism to heart. Too much CGI? Practical effects! Everything looking too shiny and new? Lets rub some mud over everything. Lightsaber fights all flash and no substance? No CGI backflipping Yodas and people zooming around on wires this time! Just two angry apprentices hammering at each-other while the world breaks apart and people's lives hang in the balance.
Everybody being related and knowing each-other makes the universe feel tiny? Ooooh yeah, they're totally going to ignore that one and make sure Finn's Mace's grandson and Rey is Luke's son and BB-8 was built by Kylo Ren as a child and....)

Re: Star Wars Thread

(Anonymous) 2017-01-25 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
Not to slow your roll, but TFA had more CGI than TPM: http://www.slashfilm.com/force-awakens-visual-effects/

Re: Star Wars Thread

(Anonymous) 2017-01-25 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT - Sure, but TFA also had more practical effects than TPM. Also, all of the effects were integrated better into the film at large. Some of that is due to better technology, but honestly, a lot of it is down to the unfortunate tendency of episodes 1-3 to showcase the effects at the expense of the pacing and the story.