[ SECRET POST #3674 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3673 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #525.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: how would you describe your political beliefs?

[(Anonymous)]

Is there a term for 'science based'? If a conservative policy shows hard evidence for success I'll embrace it, if a liberal policy shows hard evidence for success I'll embrace it.

Right now a lot of liberal policies are more science-based such as you can look at tons of evidence collected that science-based sexual education leads to fewer teen pregnancies, teens waiting longer to have sex, and even a correlation with fewer riskier behaviors in general. So it's pretty clear, supporting abstinence-only sex ed means you're pro-teens making babies, supporting science-based means you're anti-teens making babies.

However, once you start getting into the wibbly wobbly 'pink hats make some trans people uncomfortable, we should ban them.' 'but pink hats make other trans people very happy, we shouldn't ban them.' It starts getting pretty hairy because it is hard to draw the line between where an individual's pursuit of happiness impacts another's pursuit of happiness.