[ SECRET POST #3680 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3680 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Versailles]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Mad Max: Fury Road]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Star Trek: The Next Generation]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Shannara]


__________________________________________________



07.
[A Series of Unfortunate Events]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Spyro]








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #526.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

08. http://i.imgur.com/Qw3IqKM.jpg
[Spyro]

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, they're sentient. Soooo.

Also, you're not writing smut, which is the one thing I'd find squicky. So it seems cool.

[vethica]

Sapient. Most animals are sentient, unless they're dead.

[sarillia]

Ha, I thought I was the only pedant here who cared about that distinction.

[kamino_neko]

I don't generally correct people on it, but I do try to use them properly.

[(Anonymous)]

People seem to find it weird to ship things that they don't want to see fucking, but I don't really understand that tbh? like, occasionally I see the same hangups about kid-ships, even if they're being shipped completely non-sexually. Maybe I don't understand because I pretty much never seek out explicit fic for my OTPs, so there's very little difference between non-sexual ships vs ones where there's offscreen sex going on.

It's totally fine to ship things without the sexual element! (And in this case, I think, it'd also be totally fine to want two sapient non-human fantasy creatures to bang, if that's what you're into. Not my thing at all, but nothing wrong with it either.)

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, I'm one of those people who DOES read explicit fic and I have never understood the immediate assumption that shipping something means you want to see them fucking. There are tons of pairings I ship that I would never want to imagine having sex, I just want them being cute and sweet and fluffy together.

[(Anonymous)]

This is something people don't understand when encountering people who ship minor (underage) characters.

Like no, I don't want to see these children bone (unless it's set in the future). I just like the idea that they might get together, or that they are together and doing that cute middle-school dating thing where their parents drop them off at the movies and they share a shake and fries at McDonalds afterwards.

Shipping doesn't have to be sexual.

[kamino_neko]

People seem to find it weird to ship things that they don't want to see fucking, but I don't really understand that tbh?

Same...it annoys the hell out of me that 'shipping' is conflated with 'porn'. (The fact that my OTP of OTPs is a 12 year old and a 13 year old probably increases my annoyance at that, but I'd hate it on principle anyway.)