Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-02-10 06:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #3691 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3691 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

[A Series of Unfortunate Events]
__________________________________________________
05. [SPOILERS for Blood and Chocolate]

__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for Shin Sekai Yori]

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for Star Wars Rebels]
[WARNING for discussion of non-con]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #527.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: What media do you think has aged REALLY well?
One movie that has not aged well is Sneakers (1992) -- it's got an amazing cast and a fun group of characters, but the plot and the dramatic tension hinges on technology which is (obviously) very out of date, so those scenes are just funny now.
Re: What media do you think has aged REALLY well?
Re: What media do you think has aged REALLY well?
What I thought didn't age well was the dated neo-Freudian conclusion of the psychiatrist as to the root of Virginia's psychosis (early childhood trauma of rejection at the hands of a distant father) and the use of psychoanalysis to treat patients with schizophrenia [edited to add:], particularly the reliance on "therapeutic insight".
I mean, it's a great movie and its quality is not at all lessened by these things! It's just that when those parts of the movie occurred, I inwardly groaned. :)
Re: What media do you think has aged REALLY well?
Re: What media do you think has aged REALLY well?
(Anonymous) 2017-02-11 03:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: What media do you think has aged REALLY well?