case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-03-01 06:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #3710 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3710 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Glee, Mark Salling]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Pokémon/Pokémon TCG]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Scandinavia and the World]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, "Hushabye Mountain"]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Star Trek: The Next Generation, Crusher/Picard]


__________________________________________________



07.
(Fight Club)











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #530.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Aggravating Fandom Things

(Anonymous) 2017-03-02 10:34 am (UTC)(link)
That some of fandom is super-critical about one pairing "It has a two year age gap, that's pedo!" "She doesn't immediately like him when they first meet!" "It's heteronormative!" When every single thing they use to explain why the pairing is bad applies the same or worse to the fandom favorite pairing. It has a 5 year age gap and she flat out states she dislikes him and never wants to date him when they first meet and it's just as m/f as the first pairing.

I don't really like either pairing, but it pisses me off when I see people with fandom-fave pairing going on and on about how horrible other-pairing is and how gross the shippers are.