case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-03-07 07:02 pm

[ SECRET POST #3716 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3716 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 29 secrets from Secret Submission Post #531.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-03-08 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
I can get "childhood ruining" if it's about something that's external to the work - like if it came out that Bill Nye was a bank robber or something - but I really don't understand how remakes or sequels can ruin something.

It's like James Cain said about his books - Hollywood adaptations didn't do anything to his books, they were still right there on the shelf. It's damn silly.

(Anonymous) 2017-03-08 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, this. I can totally get how your childhood could be ruined by, for example, finding out about Bill Cosby if you were a big fan of The Cosby Show as a kid, because that forever taints your view of the work looking back at it. But a remake or a sequel? That doesn't alter the originals in any way. They're still exactly the same as they were when you were a kid.