case: ([ Laharl; Hmhmhm. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-05-15 05:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #496 ]


⌈ Secret Post #496 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.


__________________________________________________



24.


__________________________________________________



25.


__________________________________________________



26.


__________________________________________________



27.


__________________________________________________



28.


__________________________________________________



29.


__________________________________________________



30.


__________________________________________________



31.


__________________________________________________



32.


__________________________________________________



33.


__________________________________________________



34.


__________________________________________________



35.


__________________________________________________



36. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



37. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



38.


__________________________________________________



39.


__________________________________________________



40.


__________________________________________________



41.


__________________________________________________



42.


__________________________________________________



43.


__________________________________________________



44.


__________________________________________________



45.


__________________________________________________



46.


__________________________________________________



47.


__________________________________________________



48.


__________________________________________________



49.


__________________________________________________



50.


__________________________________________________



51.


__________________________________________________



52.


__________________________________________________



53.


__________________________________________________



54.


__________________________________________________



55.


__________________________________________________



56.


__________________________________________________



57.


__________________________________________________



58.


__________________________________________________



59.


__________________________________________________



60.


__________________________________________________



61.


__________________________________________________



62. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



63.


__________________________________________________



64.


__________________________________________________



65.


__________________________________________________



66.


__________________________________________________



67.


__________________________________________________



68.


__________________________________________________



69.


__________________________________________________



70.


__________________________________________________



71.


__________________________________________________



72.


__________________________________________________



73.


__________________________________________________



74.


__________________________________________________



75.


__________________________________________________



76.


__________________________________________________



77.


__________________________________________________



78.



Notes:

Sorry about the lack of "name the fandom!" comment yesterday. 3 finals in 24 hours will do that ethgejkth

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 85 secrets from Secret Submission Post #071.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 2 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 4 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, that guy's stuff sucks (though his Gundam OO stuff is a lot worse than his bland, mediocre Phoenix Wright stuff). There was a thread on /u/ a few weeks back where anons were tearing into his fanfiction and pointing out all the bad writing, characterization errors, and general suckiness.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Let's be honest, here:

If you want to find "characterization errors, bad writing, general suckiness" in something, you're going to find all of the above. It's called a self-serving bias. >\

That said, characterization depends on one's own personal perception of a canon character. I'm not quite sure why we're all bitchfighting over something that's essentially personal opinion. No matter what anyone says, you can't deny that the Klavier from this RP hits on all of the main points of Klavier's canon character.

Everything else, subtleties, etc. is up to the discretion of the player.

So whatever, I find him enjoyable.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm talking about cftf.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, sorry, dude. I was responding to the secret/above commentor overall. Not directed toward your comments about cftf directly... except for the self-serving bias part, I guess.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)
"self-serving bias" is funk's middle name ಠ_ಠ

(frozen comment) Re: 20

[identity profile] cftfic.livejournal.com 2008-05-16 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, it's Beckwith.

Close though.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-16 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
this is exactly your problem

you try SO HARD that people look at your behaviour and your "humor" and they cringe

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
What makes you think I have any particular bias? I tried to like his stuff because someone recced it to me and I love F/A.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
The better question is, why wouldn't you be biased?

Everyone has their own inner preconceived notion of how a character should be portrayed. If it doesn't fit your expectations, no matter if said expectations are systematically "correct" by Phoenix Wright canon standards, then hells yes you will find any and all details in said fanwork that will turn you off to the characterization.

Of course you're biased.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not a canon nazi by any means and accept most kinds of characterization as long as it is justifiable. His stuff is just bad. I'm almost starting to think you're him.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Nope, nice try, though! I don't write women.

And being biased does not mean you're a canon nazi. Did you read my definition of a self-serving bias? EVERYONE is fucking biased. There IS no correct characterization except for what the official writers of Phoenix Wright dictate.

Basically, this whole argument is bullshit because everyone's conception of a character could be completely different while, at the same time, being completely WRONG when placed against the writers' intentions.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) - 2008-05-15 22:59 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) - 2008-05-15 23:02 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) - 2008-05-15 23:03 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) - 2008-05-15 23:04 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) - 2008-05-15 23:05 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) - 2008-05-15 23:14 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) - 2008-05-15 23:18 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) (no subject)

[identity profile] sun-smiles.livejournal.com - 2008-05-15 23:28 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) (no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2008-05-15 23:38 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't see why Funk gets so much hate. His stuff isn't very good, but it isn't very bad either. Save your whining for someone who is genuinely terrible, not just completely average.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
That mediocrity is exactly why people don't like him. Good fics are impressive and nice to read. Bad fics can at least be laughed at. What do you do with something so bland and middle-of-the-road that it might as well not exist?

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
he writes his lesbian stuff like he's never seen a woman before.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)
He's average at everything he tries his hand at but is just so pompous and off-putting OOC at the same time. He is socailly retarded, which people mistake for arrogance, and they end up hating him instead of doing us all a favour and just ignoring him.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
ia

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
At least he's slightly more tolerable in other fandoms. I don't know what the hell it is about PW fandom that make people go bugfuck insane.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
here is my theory about that: phoenix wright fandom is pretty stupid and the output is generally lame, but it is also one of the friendlier fandoms around. like a retarded kid or a dumb dog or something. because of this, he comes off as a raaaaaaaaaaging prick who nonetheless writes good fanfiction/rp. but in any other fandom, he'd just be your average asshole fanboy with stuff no one cares about. that's why no one cares about him in, say, gundam 00 fandom, where a lot of people write better than him, but there are much bigger assholes to target.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Trufax.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-15 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Sounds about right

(frozen comment) Re: 20

[identity profile] cftfic.livejournal.com 2008-05-16 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
'Gundam 00 stuff'?

Um. If you're referring to the like 2-page minific I did on a whim after episode 9/10, sure. I don't think I've really done anything else in that fandom unless I'm uh misremembering. I'll agree that the one ficlet wasn't particularly inspired in the least, but it's not like I'm very prolific there :P

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-16 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
and yet it was still terrible

(frozen comment) Re: 20

[identity profile] cftfic.livejournal.com 2008-05-16 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Never said it wasn't.

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-16 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
...

so you are saying that you put up fic even when you know it's completely horrible. ~noble~

(frozen comment) Re: 20

(Anonymous) 2008-05-16 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
Knowingly subjecting an audience to bad writing... awesome attitude for a student and an aspiring journalist to have.